Pre-Seed

US, Global

Crypto, DeFi, FinTech

How Liquorice Raised a $1.3M Pre-Seed in 4 Months From 8 Investors

A capital efficiency tool and shared inventory layer for on-chain trading. Two co-founders from crypto market-making raised $1.3M from three VC funds and five angels in four months, on 100% warm intros and zero runway.

Raise snapshot

Raised

$1.3M

Duration

4 months

Investors

8

Check size

$10–25K angels, ~$700K lead

Revenue at close

Pre-product

The investor funnel

Investors reached126
First meetings—
Second+ meetings—
Term sheets86.3%
Investors reached126
First meetings—
Second+ meetings—
Term sheets86.3%

The company

  • Liquorice — a capital efficiency tool and shared inventory layer for on-chain trading

  • US-incorporated, with global traction

  • Raised — $1.3M from three VC funds and five angel investors

  • Instrument — SAFE plus a token warrant, and some side letters

  • Pre-seed and effectively pre-product at the time of the raise

Founders

  • Team of two co-founders

  • Misha — founded VelvetFormula, an early crypto market-making company providing liquidity to digital-asset exchanges, with clients including crypto.com; before that, exited a FinTech startup

  • Toly — owned B2Broker’s institutional crypto liquidity product, with $3B/month turnover

  • This was Misha’s third fundraise

  • A couple of developers partnered with them, essentially for free, to build the product — investors read that as traction in attracting talent

Pipeline and channel

The one term sheet came from the lead; the other two VC funds and five angels joined behind it on the same SAFE — the chart’s last row counts all eight.

  • 100% warm intros — an experiment: not a single cold letter or message was sent

  • The mechanic — you pitch, the investor passes and offers an intro to someone at another fund; the angels you pitched introduce you further, “a self-propelling thing”

  • The target from the start was to hit 100 investors; it landed at 126

  • The honest trade-off — warm intros work perfectly, but they are slow; four months is a slow fundraise

  • Generating a warm intro is a big task in itself

Timeline and runway

  • Four months from start to close

  • Term sheet negotiations — about a week; everything else was pitching, and finding the warm intro to pitch

  • Runway at start — zero: no salaries, no employees, the two founders lived on their savings

  • Lead investor — no deliberate lead hunt; Misha pitched everyone and was looking for any type of check, not specifically a lead

  • The lead was a fund that takes fairly long to do deals; once its term sheet arrived, the round was effectively closed

  • Oversubscribed more than 2x after the term sheet — some funds had to be cut

Pitch deck and data room

  • Pre-seed and effectively pre-product, so there wasn’t much to show

  • Two or three hackathons — what they built there, the prototype and how it is going to work

  • A deck and a forecast model were made, but “the model is probably not important at all at this stage”

  • What matters at pre-seed is founder fit — previous experience, why this problem, why these two together and how long they have known each other

Most common rejections

  • Too early — “we like the product, but we want to see traction”

  • Execution doubt — one fund said outright that it did not believe the team could execute

  • Honest answers are rare; most passes come as white lies about traction or stage, or simply not vibing with the founders

  • Investors were looking for two things — a good idea and the momentum of the raise itself; the slow process cost them the second

Metrics at close

  • Angel checks — $10K to $25K; checks above $50K from angels are rare in crypto

  • The lead investor took half the round — about $700K

  • Oversubscribed more than 2x once the term sheet was signed

  • Instrument — SAFE plus a token warrant, with some side letters

  • Effectively pre-product — the hackathon prototype was the demo

Lessons learned

  • Momentum is the core lesson — investors you talked to three or four weeks ago drift away when they see no new checks or fundraising news

  • Compress the raise into weeks, not months — “avoid being slow”; when you need money you are desperate, and investors feel it

  • The crypto follower dynamic — around 90% of crypto funds follow; secure a lead and the round is oversubscribed

  • Raise when the market is ready for it, not when you are — favorable conditions beat need

  • If raising again — keep warm intros, the best tool there is, but find a way to generate them faster

  • Next round — October; this time the opposite experiment, cold outreach made efficient with AI, plus an AI-built social graph to generate more warm intros

“The biggest mistake is to do a long fundraise. Try to do it very compressed, because when you need money, you’re desperate and the investors feel that.”

— Misha, co-founder of Liquorice

More raise breakdowns

Ready to fill your calendar?

Ready to fill your calendar?

Join 200+ founders who raised $1.1B with Fundraisly.

Join 200+ founders who raised $1.1B with Fundraisly.