Pre-Seed
US, Global
Crypto, DeFi, FinTech
How Liquorice Raised a $1.3M Pre-Seed in 4 Months From 8 Investors
A capital efficiency tool and shared inventory layer for on-chain trading. Two co-founders from crypto market-making raised $1.3M from three VC funds and five angels in four months, on 100% warm intros and zero runway.
Raise snapshot
Raised
$1.3M
Duration
4 months
Investors
8
Check size
$10–25K angels, ~$700K lead
Revenue at close
Pre-product
The investor funnel
The company
Liquorice — a capital efficiency tool and shared inventory layer for on-chain trading
US-incorporated, with global traction
Raised — $1.3M from three VC funds and five angel investors
Instrument — SAFE plus a token warrant, and some side letters
Pre-seed and effectively pre-product at the time of the raise
Founders
Team of two co-founders
Misha — founded VelvetFormula, an early crypto market-making company providing liquidity to digital-asset exchanges, with clients including crypto.com; before that, exited a FinTech startup
Toly — owned B2Broker’s institutional crypto liquidity product, with $3B/month turnover
This was Misha’s third fundraise
A couple of developers partnered with them, essentially for free, to build the product — investors read that as traction in attracting talent
Pipeline and channel
The one term sheet came from the lead; the other two VC funds and five angels joined behind it on the same SAFE — the chart’s last row counts all eight.
100% warm intros — an experiment: not a single cold letter or message was sent
The mechanic — you pitch, the investor passes and offers an intro to someone at another fund; the angels you pitched introduce you further, “a self-propelling thing”
The target from the start was to hit 100 investors; it landed at 126
The honest trade-off — warm intros work perfectly, but they are slow; four months is a slow fundraise
Generating a warm intro is a big task in itself
Timeline and runway
Four months from start to close
Term sheet negotiations — about a week; everything else was pitching, and finding the warm intro to pitch
Runway at start — zero: no salaries, no employees, the two founders lived on their savings
Lead investor — no deliberate lead hunt; Misha pitched everyone and was looking for any type of check, not specifically a lead
The lead was a fund that takes fairly long to do deals; once its term sheet arrived, the round was effectively closed
Oversubscribed more than 2x after the term sheet — some funds had to be cut
Pitch deck and data room
Pre-seed and effectively pre-product, so there wasn’t much to show
Two or three hackathons — what they built there, the prototype and how it is going to work
A deck and a forecast model were made, but “the model is probably not important at all at this stage”
What matters at pre-seed is founder fit — previous experience, why this problem, why these two together and how long they have known each other
Most common rejections
Too early — “we like the product, but we want to see traction”
Execution doubt — one fund said outright that it did not believe the team could execute
Honest answers are rare; most passes come as white lies about traction or stage, or simply not vibing with the founders
Investors were looking for two things — a good idea and the momentum of the raise itself; the slow process cost them the second
Metrics at close
Angel checks — $10K to $25K; checks above $50K from angels are rare in crypto
The lead investor took half the round — about $700K
Oversubscribed more than 2x once the term sheet was signed
Instrument — SAFE plus a token warrant, with some side letters
Effectively pre-product — the hackathon prototype was the demo
Lessons learned
Momentum is the core lesson — investors you talked to three or four weeks ago drift away when they see no new checks or fundraising news
Compress the raise into weeks, not months — “avoid being slow”; when you need money you are desperate, and investors feel it
The crypto follower dynamic — around 90% of crypto funds follow; secure a lead and the round is oversubscribed
Raise when the market is ready for it, not when you are — favorable conditions beat need
If raising again — keep warm intros, the best tool there is, but find a way to generate them faster
Next round — October; this time the opposite experiment, cold outreach made efficient with AI, plus an AI-built social graph to generate more warm intros
“The biggest mistake is to do a long fundraise. Try to do it very compressed, because when you need money, you’re desperate and the investors feel that.”
— Misha, co-founder of Liquorice
More raise breakdowns
Webout (now Fourtly)

$2.3M
How Webout (now Fourtly) Raised $2.3M Across Two Rounds From 5 Investors
Personalized content that turns customer attention into revenue. A Czech-incorporated team of two raised $2.3M across two rounds, with a bank’s corporate VC as the lead and 80% of the money from warm intros.
Investor funnel
Watch the breakdown →
EchoWi

€750K
How EchoWi Raised a €750K Pre-Seed in 4 Months From 8 Investors
Optimizing brand visibility in AI-generated answers. Two Spanish co-founders raised €750K from three VC funds and five angels in four months via warm intros.
Investor funnel
Watch the breakdown →
NOUS Energy

€2.3M
How NOUS Energy Raised a €2.3M Seed in 13 Months From 3 VC Funds
Innovative ingredients for food, beverage and supplements. A solo founder in Italy raised €2.3M from three VC funds in 13 months, nine of them in due diligence.
Investor funnel
Watch the breakdown →
Sunbay

€610K
How Sunbay Raised €610K Across Two Rounds From 6 Investors
Software that turns chasing invoices into a managed process. Three Polish co-founders raised €610K across two rounds, with the lead investor met at Slush.
Investor funnel
Watch the breakdown →